Saturday, May 09, 2015

Dear @BarackObama: Salary Exemption Is Broken

Mr. President:

    I realize that your presidency is fast coming to its end.  I also realize that during your presidency, you've attempted to make things right for Americans.  I haven't always agreed with some of the things you've proposed (I think Obamacare is radically overpriced, for example, and I don't feel that amnesty is the right answer for illegals), and I think other things have been deprioritized that should have been front and center (that we still have overreaching TSA, the tax code is still broken, and banks are still allowed to discriminate against people based on faulty credit agencies that are making billions in profit).

I do want to call to attention an issue that's always been there, and that's pay.  Not hourly pay.  Salaried pay.  For you see, employers have long been abusing this in order to minimize how much they need to pay employees.

The law was apparently written during a time when the idea of a "professional" position really involved someone in management.  Over the years companies have extended this with numerous sub-exemptions that pretty much label anyone not working data entry, customer service, mail room or retail, as an "exempt" employee.  This lets them avoid paying overtime, but with no penalty applied against the company when they abuse the employee's time.

As companies downsize due to the Recession, the changes in minimum wage, the rise of offshoring, etc., many companies figured out that they could simply stack double the work on an employee, but were not required to pay them any additional money for time above and beyond 40 hours.  Normally, this should work the other way: if an employee works at least an hour and gets their work done, that should be sufficient.  It's not.  Companies require employees to stay around for 40 hours minimum, even to the degree of requiring timesheets to back up that they put in a full 40 hours.

This goes against the very spirit of a "salaried" employee, which was intended to pay a person based on work being completed, not a duration of time being allotted.

But the complexity gets worse. An "Exempt" employee could be paid hourly (Computer professional exemption).  The requirements for this are even less logical: all a company has to do is agree to an hourly rate of at least $27.  If a person clocks one hour, they're paid $27.  They get no overtime, so if a company abuses their hours, they get paid flat for the extra time investment above 40 hours, which doesn't go a long way towards properly compensating the employee for "going above and beyond" - the true spirit of overtime time-and-a-half pay.

If a company hires an employee that does not do any of the "primary duty" work for that company, BUT is instead "lended" to another company as a consultant, some companies are abusing the exemption by saying that the work done for the other company qualifies.


This is all to the detriment of the employee, benefit of the employer, and has cost people millions of dollars in lost overtime pay.

Something should be done about this to ensure that people who go above and beyond are compensated, regardless of status, work type, or job type, so long as they are not management employees.  To me that's as simple as creating a single criteria for exemption: a person must have a direct report in order to be exempted from overtime pay OR your annual salary is at least 2x the median for the state, whichever happens to come first and must adjust with inflation.

This has four possible net effects.

One, companies will increase salaries so they don't need to pay overtime; a fixed annual investment in lieu of a variable hourly investment.

Two, a significant increase in the number of employees eligible for overtime, but a sharp decrease in the amount of overtime those employees are allowed (forced) to work.

Three, continuing re-evaluation of employee salaries to ensure they don't lose the exemption.  If a state's median is $40k and an employee makes $85k, they're exempt that year, but if the median rises the following year to $60k, the employee must now make at least $120k (a substantial raise that most companies won't do), or be now eligible to receive overtime pay at time-and-a-half (which lets the company constrain overtime accordingly).

Four, companies will hire more employees to do work rather than force existing employees to do overtime and pay more than they would pay additional staff.  This lightens workloads across the board - right now, employers are doing everything they can to minimize staff, which creates burden on existing employees who don't get fairly compensated for the extra work they're doing.


I am not sure if you're the right outlet to hear the plea, but I think the plea should be heard and considered.  It's a problem.  It's been a problem for far too long.  The fix is terribly easy; get rid of all of the complex, confusing exemptions that benefit only employers.  Put the power back in the hands of the employees by dumbing down the exemption: either they have at least one direct report (which they need to manage documentation for, of course), OR they make at least 2x the median, adjusted with inflation.  Otherwise, no exemption for that year.

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Day 8: The @Casper Mattress Challenge

Night 8. The windows did make a difference. Not a major, earth shattering one, but a difference nonetheless.

Sleep Pattern

I laid down around 10, knocked out around 11.   Hit REM sleep, dreamed about something to do with engineering.  Got up at 6am.

Not as groggy as the night before. But unlike the first couple of nights, I felt like staying in bed.

Body And Positioning

I turned a few times. I get the sense that I will never be able to just sleep without turning, unlike when I was a teen.

Was wrong about 65 degrees as I was hot again.

Mattress Durability

Shape still intact.  Slightly soft, but not sagging.

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Day 7: The @Casper Mattress Challenge

Night 7. Tomorrow I (hopefully) get to hear a lot less sound from my windows.

Sleep Pattern

I laid down around 11, knocked out around midnight.   Hit REM sleep, dreamed in the third person watching something going on.  Got up at 6am.

Slightly more groggy than expected, but that might have been the hours.

Body And Positioning

I turned only twice: once to the right and once onto my back, which is where I stayed for a bit. lower left side hurt.

65 degrees seems to be the nighttime sweet spot. I was hot but not unbearably so.

Mattress Durability

Shape still intact.  No noticeable softness, at least not like before the trip. Interesting.

Monday, March 09, 2015

Day 6: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge

Night 6 and really looking forward to that window install on Wednesday.

Sleep Pattern

I laid down around 8pm, knocked out around 10pm.   Hit REM sleep (don't recall the dreams, but I know I did because it took the alarm to wake me and at first I thought it was part of the dream).  Got up at 6am.

I felt a little groggy.  Definitely less than the day prior.  So my initial theory about my body getting "back used to" the mattress after travel is probably a sound theory.

Body And Positioning

I turned quite a few times. I also had some pain on my left side (which is why I kept turning, so as not to lay on that side, but I eventually felt uncomfortable on my right side and would turn).

Heat overcame, had to pull back the comforter again.

Mattress Durability

Shape still intact.  No noticeable softness.

Sunday, March 08, 2015

Day 5: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge

Night 5 (officially), back from travel.  Having slept on a Spring Air mattress at Residence Inn, I now have a definite point of comparison from a "sink in" perspective.  (If you didn't know, Spring Air is quite possibly the most comfortable overall mattress possible.  But it IS a spring mattress.)

Sleep Pattern

Again, it's the weekend so noise was not as bad or as prevalent.  I was also dead tired due to extensive travel, medication and long working hours.

I laid down around 8pm, knocked out around 9pm, which is a record for me.   I don't exactly remember reaching REM sleep though; I assume I must have and don't remember, but I was out until 7:00am the next morning.  I got up groggy, which was strange.

To compare, the Spring Air mattress plus a waffle cone ice cream had me knocked out cold for a good 12 hours, but with no dreaming, even after reading rather vivid books. Without the waffle cone, I was about 6-7 hours sleep with mid-time wakeup.

Body And Positioning

I turned maybe twice.  To be fair, I was also tossing and turning on the Spring Air mattress, and quite a bit more, so maybe my body just doesn't like being stationary, I don't know.  It's also possible that my body was starting to get used to the Casper mattress and reacted to this totally different mattress.

No heat overcoming.  This is with the thermostat set to 70 and the exterior temperature in the high 30's/low 40's; that's WITH pajama bottoms.

No pain at all this time.

Mattress Durability

Shape still intact.  After my 5-day business trip I noticed the softness was gone, too.  So it will go back firm eventually as long as you don't sleep on it for a while.

Monday, March 02, 2015

Day 4: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge

Night 4, another difference.  As a side note this is the first mattress where I experienced a difference night-to-night as opposed to, say, week-to-week.

Sleep Pattern

I laid down around 8pm but didn't actually go to sleep until around 11:30pm.  Longer to go to sleep.  Did enter REM because I distinctly the dream having something to do with being called fat (which I'm not even close to, thus why I remember it), but I woke up twice, once at 1am, and again at 4:30am.  I'm not sure what the deal was with the 1am wakeup; it may simply have been too much on my mind in anticipation of my Tuesday travel.  I had to actually read myself back to sleep which took 30-ish minutes or so.  4:30am made sense because again, cars and traffic hitting the roads likely woke me.

Body And Positioning

Tossing and turning while awake, not so much when entering sleep and likely very little after going to full sleep.  Different position, once again feeling rested and not groggy.  I'm noticing a pattern at least with this - regardless of disrupted sleep I don't have a feeling of wanting to stay in bed like I usually would.

No heat overcoming.  This is with the thermostat set to 65 and the exterior temperature in the high 30's/low 40's.  One difference here is that unlike usual, I didn't wear pajama bottoms.  Interesting.

No pain at all this time.

Mattress Durability

The mattress continues to maintain its shape.  However it's significantly softer than when first unrolled, to the point that when lying in bed, you can now feel your "place" as it were.  It's not like you're stuck in that place though, if you move or roll you can still do so without being impeded.  What's not yet known is whether body heat is the strongest reason for this.

Sunday, March 01, 2015

Day 3: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge

The third night I again experienced a difference.

Sleep Pattern

This time, as I was working a little late, I laid down around 10pm but didn't actually nod off until just after 11pm.  So it again took me a little longer to go to sleep than the previous day; two things were different (and one is likely because it's a weekend).  First, I didn't wake up midstream like I did before.  I actually slept through to around 7am-ish; I officially "woke" around 6:45am and was in a half-awake-half-asleep state for the rest.  Didn't take me as long to go to sleep and I woke up after a full night.   

Again, it's a weekend and specifically a Sunday morning, so even fewer cars on the road.  Tonight will be a good test of this theory, as it will be a Monday morning when I expect the worst of outside noise.  If it turns out I get woken up midstream, it means that it's noise disrupting me, and once the new windows are in (which have sound control properties), it should be a somewhat better experience.  The one window that I have in my home office which matches the forthcoming new ones performs so well that I get tempted to sleep in there every night.

Body And Positioning

 Definitely a lot of tossing and turning again, at least initially.  I assume that at some point I stopped and went to dead sleep because I know I hit REM; it was a rather lengthy dream. I woke up in the same position I'd left off, once again feeling rested and not groggy.

Heat overcame me on a few occasions where I had to pull the comforter.  In fact I fell asleep with just the sheet on because it was so hot.  I was almost tempted to grab a fan.  Mind, this is after the mattress sitting in a room not exceeding 65 degrees all day.

The only pain I experienced was on my right knee.  I sleep with a leg pillow to align my spine when I sleep on my side, and if I sleep on the right side (which is more comfortable than sleeping on the left, for some reason), depending on how I sink in, it will shift my kneecap, which is probably what happened here.  I can't confirm that - since I was asleep - but it's the only reason I can think of.  Means I sunk into the mattress more than the first two days.  Although it's rather intriguing that pain seems to only happen in spots.

Mattress Durability

Once again the mattress went down on a simple finger press, very easily, two inches this time.  Felt like a sponge rather than latex or memory foam, only in the area I slept in.  But it maintained its shape, for the most part.  I did observe what appeared to be some slight bowing downward; when I looked under the platform it didn't look uneven.  It might be my imagination.  I'll keep an eye on it.

Saturday, February 28, 2015

Day 2: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge

The second night felt markedly different from the first, not just from my body but from the mattress.

Sleep Pattern

I again laid down around 8:30pm but this time didn't actually nod off until just after 10pm.  So it took me a little longer to go to sleep than the previous day; but I woke up (my usual wake up before the "official wakeup) around 4:30 am this time.  So while it took longer to go to sleep, I slept longer before being woken up.  I'm almost confident this is because of noise outside the window; because it's a Saturday, there are less cars flying by my window early morning than there would be on a weekday.  This may very well be skewing the experience.   

It will be interesting to see what my sleep pattern is like after getting the windows replaced; unfortunately the windows won't be replaced until likely after this 30-day period; so I may need to a follow up period afterwards.  I don't want to extend the period because there will a come a point that there won't be any significant change in results.

Body And Positioning

But what is not affected by the windows is my body and posture.  Again I woke up feeling rested and not groggy despite not getting a full undisturbed sleep.  However, unlike yesterday, I did have two occasions where the body heat overcame my position and I had to pull the comforter back to release it.  It didn't happen after that; the mattress didn't feel hot, but I certainly did, more so than the previous day.  So it seemed as though the mattress hit a point of not being able to absorb additional heat, but that point or threshold was significantly higher than other mattresses.

It felt like I did more tossing and turning than I did the previous night.  I simply could not get comfortable.  On the two occasions that I laid on my back and just turned my head, I was comfortable, but I hate sleeping in that position.  Goes back to what I said about back sleepers vs. side sleepers in terms of getting used to the mattress.  I think as a side sleeper there is just a longer break-in time, unfortunately.  

Unexpected was the presence of pain on my right hip area.  It wasn't on the bone, just above it.  This was just before rolling onto my back, where the pain seemed to move (meaning the mattress was contributing to it).  It wasn't unbearable pain, but pain regardless.  It felt like it was around my diaphragm area, which likely means the mattress didn't have enough "give" to allow my breathing to work properly (your diaphragm expects to move smoothly upwards to expand and contract your lungs.  Anything pressing against your front, side or back can impact this experience, resulting in pain or at least the perception of pain).  If that's the case it might contribute to snoring, something I don't do.  The abdomen/back pain continues as of the time of this writing, though a lot less subdued.  I have to actually focus on it and move around to sense it.  Hip pain is almost non-existent. 

Mattress Durability

I again noticed that the mattress again did not look like anyone had slept in it.  However, pressing down on the mattress revealed a clear softness in the place where I was sleeping vs. where I wasn't.  It still kept its shape nicely, but most certainly was not firm in that area.  It didn't go down more than an inch or so before again hitting resistance.  This is similar to the no-name memory foam mattress I mentioned after I first bought it; it would initially be firm, but as heat increased, would get soft and eventually not go back to original shape.  I will update tomorrow's results with tonight's "press test".  If it goes back to its original firmness every time then the softness isn't that big of a deal.


I will be able to sleep on the mattress three more days, then I'm off on business travel for four days, then I'll pick up where I left off.  Unfortunately sleeping in a different (likely spring) bed is going to throw off my body's adjustment.  Might be a good thing since it's closer to the reality of bed adjustment anyway.

Friday, February 27, 2015

Day 1: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge

Short and sweet: After setting up the Casper mattress yesterday, I of course slept on it.  Note, it's just me, there isn't a "couple debate" about the firmness or anything.  The feedback is 100% mine.

Bodies take a while to adjust to a new mattress.  It is this break-in period that makes people frustrated, because you can't account for it in a mattress store.  It's the reason I'm going to share feedback over a number of days, because the experience will most certainly be different day-to-day as my body adjusts.

I noticed two things immediately with the Casper mattress.  First, it kept its shape extremely well.  Second, it never sunk in beyond a certain point even when just directly sitting on it.  As a muscular 180-pound guy, this tells me that the mattress can definitely handle at least an "average" sized guy and lower.

My usual routine is to read and/or play mobile games until I get sleepy.  I'll often start at around 8pm and be sleepy by 10pm-ish, sometimes longer.  I didn't last that long with the Casper.  I was definitely out before 10pm.  My body was also its usual hotness, but despite being under a sheet and a comforter, it wasn't ever uncomfortable underneath me.  The mattress started cool like a gel pad, then warmed just enough to match my body temperature.  It never got softer.

I can only describe the experience as similar laying on a mattress pad at summer camp that has a topper on it (obviously, camp beds do not have toppers, I'm just saying).  It's firm, but not uncomfortably firm.  Although people who don't like firm mattresses may be up in arms at that statement, the mattress just did not cause any pain points with its level of firmness because it did give at the sharp points (hips, elbows, shoulders, etc) but stood fast at the dull points (side, abs, thighs, etc).  You have the distinct feeling of lying on top of something flat, in other words, but whatever that something is, isn't pressing against your body like a table might.

I have a tendency to shift position over night mostly because of the old mattresses and I did so also with the Casper, but it was more out of habit than discomfort.  I think my body was just expecting softness and didn't get it.  That's okay, because unlike with the older mattresses, I did reach REM sleep on at least three occasions, and even though I woke up during the night (around 2:30am) like I usually do, it was not difficult to go back to sleep.  I think I was woken up because of noise outside the window (my house is on an arterial, and the windows only cut noise down about 50%.  That's changing in the near future), not the mattress.

This morning, I wasn't groggy when I got up.  I wasn't as sharp as I might have been as a kid, but that could just be age.  What's important is that I didn't have any lower back pain (which was common with the older mattresses), or neck pain, and I felt truly awake and rested.  Had I not woken up in the middle of the night I might have felt even better, and hopefully that day will come.  The mattress, of course, looks like I haven't even slept in it.  Not a single dent, despite my shifting, sitting and turning over 12 hours.

It's safe to say that if you are a back sleeper this mattress will probably feel ultra comfortable.  Side sleepers may have a longer adjustment period simply because your body has gotten used to "sinking in" where it won't with this mattress.  Stomach sleepers (I still don't understand how this is even possible, but yeah) SHOULD be able to sleep soundly on this mattress with the right pillow.  I think the problem with stomach sleepers is that your head and back get arched too much if you use a pillow that's too thick or too firm; you really should go without a pillow or get a down pillow so that your spine remains in alignment.

Tune in tomorrow for the next sleep experience.

The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge: Order Process

Image screenshot credit: http://www.casper.com
Casper, a young New York company, set out in 2014 to attempt to do for mattress shopping what Steve Jobs tried to do in 2007: reinvent the product.  Think of things from a different angle.  Change the market.  After raising venture capital, they launched a mattress brand by the same name.  As I was already on the hunt for the "perfect sleep experience", I figured I would give them a try.  I'll use Blogger (assuming Google doesn't delete my blog because I have a photo of a mattress, which is normally used in porn - long story), and I will track the experience over time.

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Frontier Airlines. You're ALMOST There.




I had a recent opportunity to not only fly on Frontier Airlines for the very first time (including the precedent airlines, Midwest and Republic), but to sample their nonstop route between Seattle, WA and Cleveland, OH.  The creation of nonstop routes used to be a "meh" moment, since every airline was traveling nonstop between popular destinations.  But as larger airlines merged and bought each other out and/or filed bankruptcy, we see less and less nonstop flights.  I want to share the experience, as well as tell you a bit about Frontier Airlines from an infrequent flyer's perspective.


Dear Mr. President: You're Wrong About #Ebola










Has anyone noticed how oddly similar the Ebola strain looks to Michaelangelo's "Creation of Adam"?  Coincidence? I think not.

Anyway, that's not the point of this post, Mr. Obama.  The point of the post is to call you out on a few things where you have publicly criticized "hysteria and fear".  This is because you totally missed the boat on why people are afraid.  They have legitimate concerns that haven't been addressed by the government that is elected to look out for them.  Here's what you missed.


Saturday, July 05, 2014

Like A Boss: How To Debate Effectively

A lot of people don't truly understand what debating means.  Some think it means arguing.  It doesn't.  Though you do present "arguments" in a debate, it doesn't mean you're "arguing".  Let's explore that.


Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Buying That First Home Round Two - Part 4

So now you have a sense of things.  The next thing to know seems obvious, but many people make a critical mistake when going hunting for a home:

Get Your Funding In Order.

Saturday, March 01, 2014

Buying That First Home Round Two - Part 3

Now, let's talk about a somewhat controversial topic: short sales, and the #1 thing to know about them:

Banks Don't Really Like Short Sales.

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Buying That First Home Round Two - Part 2

Hopefully you read the first article.  If not, you should.  There's a lot of good information there:

Do Your Own Research BEFORE Contacting a REALTOR

Assuming you've gotten this far, it's important you understand what you're up against in terms of what's out there.  Depending on your buying power, you may find lots of inventory or very little.  It really does depend on the metro, and in this current economy, a lot of homes are being taken by Chinese investors who are dropping 100% cash to buy the homes as an investment (and in some cases, to hide their income in another country).  What's left over is going to fit into a number of categories, and you should understand the differences.


Saturday, February 15, 2014

Buying That First Home Round Two - Part 1

Many may recall years ago (around 2008) I attempted to purchase a home in Oceanside, CA.  That home was a quant device that seemed as though it just was mistreated by the previous owners.  I didn't understand the process, and I trusted way too much.  I learned a lot of lessons about what not to do and swore never to make those same mistakes the next time I was "ready".

Since coming to Washington State I've realized that, though I'm working harder than I ever have before, the opportunity and net cost of living are dramatically different.  This year, as a New Years Resolution, I resolved to do two things: (A) graduate college and (B) buy a home.  Both are in progress (I told you about Western Governors University), but let me talk about (B), and let's see if I can help you.


Tuesday, January 07, 2014

Gay Rights <> Civil (Race) Rights

I make the assumption that you're up on the recent news about Mark Zmuda, right?  No?  Let me enlighten you.  Then I'll explain why Seattle and certain news outlets are responsible for the very negative image that Western Washington has compared to the rest of the nation.

Saturday, January 04, 2014

What is the "Parable Test"?

Previously, I mentioned something I refer to as a "Parable Test".  I'm now going to define this test and how it applies to everyday life.

In a simple definition, the measurement of the Parable Test is that something must meet at least one of four criteria (though ideally it would meet all of them): Quantifiable, Justifiable, Verifiable, Testable.  But what's that exactly mean?


Analyzing the Pacquiao/Marquez Feud




The boxing universe (if there is such a thing) waxes emotional about certain feuds.  Ward/Gatti, Ali/Frazier, Ali/Liston, Tyson/Holyfield, Leonard/Duran, and a whole host of others across various weight classes.  Many years from now, they will be hotly debating one of the most controversial feuds in history: Manny Pacquiao and Juan Manuel Marquez - two certified Hall of Famers.  But if you look past the fights themselves and analyze the fighters behind the fights, you'll start to see some obvious signs about why they seemed so matched...and you can easily predict how each would perform against certain other notable fighters.  First, let's look at the fights.