Every day, ReV is going to speak about something: an industry, a ruling, an athlete, a music artist, a video game...the possibilities are endless. Come and partake in the information given, and provide your thoughts.
Saturday, May 09, 2015
Dear @BarackObama: Salary Exemption Is Broken
I realize that your presidency is fast coming to its end. I also realize that during your presidency, you've attempted to make things right for Americans. I haven't always agreed with some of the things you've proposed (I think Obamacare is radically overpriced, for example, and I don't feel that amnesty is the right answer for illegals), and I think other things have been deprioritized that should have been front and center (that we still have overreaching TSA, the tax code is still broken, and banks are still allowed to discriminate against people based on faulty credit agencies that are making billions in profit).
I do want to call to attention an issue that's always been there, and that's pay. Not hourly pay. Salaried pay. For you see, employers have long been abusing this in order to minimize how much they need to pay employees.
The law was apparently written during a time when the idea of a "professional" position really involved someone in management. Over the years companies have extended this with numerous sub-exemptions that pretty much label anyone not working data entry, customer service, mail room or retail, as an "exempt" employee. This lets them avoid paying overtime, but with no penalty applied against the company when they abuse the employee's time.
As companies downsize due to the Recession, the changes in minimum wage, the rise of offshoring, etc., many companies figured out that they could simply stack double the work on an employee, but were not required to pay them any additional money for time above and beyond 40 hours. Normally, this should work the other way: if an employee works at least an hour and gets their work done, that should be sufficient. It's not. Companies require employees to stay around for 40 hours minimum, even to the degree of requiring timesheets to back up that they put in a full 40 hours.
This goes against the very spirit of a "salaried" employee, which was intended to pay a person based on work being completed, not a duration of time being allotted.
But the complexity gets worse. An "Exempt" employee could be paid hourly (Computer professional exemption). The requirements for this are even less logical: all a company has to do is agree to an hourly rate of at least $27. If a person clocks one hour, they're paid $27. They get no overtime, so if a company abuses their hours, they get paid flat for the extra time investment above 40 hours, which doesn't go a long way towards properly compensating the employee for "going above and beyond" - the true spirit of overtime time-and-a-half pay.
If a company hires an employee that does not do any of the "primary duty" work for that company, BUT is instead "lended" to another company as a consultant, some companies are abusing the exemption by saying that the work done for the other company qualifies.
This is all to the detriment of the employee, benefit of the employer, and has cost people millions of dollars in lost overtime pay.
Something should be done about this to ensure that people who go above and beyond are compensated, regardless of status, work type, or job type, so long as they are not management employees. To me that's as simple as creating a single criteria for exemption: a person must have a direct report in order to be exempted from overtime pay OR your annual salary is at least 2x the median for the state, whichever happens to come first and must adjust with inflation.
This has four possible net effects.
One, companies will increase salaries so they don't need to pay overtime; a fixed annual investment in lieu of a variable hourly investment.
Two, a significant increase in the number of employees eligible for overtime, but a sharp decrease in the amount of overtime those employees are allowed (forced) to work.
Three, continuing re-evaluation of employee salaries to ensure they don't lose the exemption. If a state's median is $40k and an employee makes $85k, they're exempt that year, but if the median rises the following year to $60k, the employee must now make at least $120k (a substantial raise that most companies won't do), or be now eligible to receive overtime pay at time-and-a-half (which lets the company constrain overtime accordingly).
Four, companies will hire more employees to do work rather than force existing employees to do overtime and pay more than they would pay additional staff. This lightens workloads across the board - right now, employers are doing everything they can to minimize staff, which creates burden on existing employees who don't get fairly compensated for the extra work they're doing.
I am not sure if you're the right outlet to hear the plea, but I think the plea should be heard and considered. It's a problem. It's been a problem for far too long. The fix is terribly easy; get rid of all of the complex, confusing exemptions that benefit only employers. Put the power back in the hands of the employees by dumbing down the exemption: either they have at least one direct report (which they need to manage documentation for, of course), OR they make at least 2x the median, adjusted with inflation. Otherwise, no exemption for that year.
Thursday, March 12, 2015
Day 8: The @Casper Mattress Challenge
Night 8. The windows did make a difference. Not a major, earth shattering one, but a difference nonetheless.
Sleep Pattern
I laid down around 10, knocked out around 11. Hit REM sleep, dreamed about something to do with engineering. Got up at 6am.
Not as groggy as the night before. But unlike the first couple of nights, I felt like staying in bed.
Body And Positioning
I turned a few times. I get the sense that I will never be able to just sleep without turning, unlike when I was a teen.
Was wrong about 65 degrees as I was hot again.
Mattress Durability
Shape still intact. Slightly soft, but not sagging.
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Day 7: The @Casper Mattress Challenge
Night 7. Tomorrow I (hopefully) get to hear a lot less sound from my windows.
Sleep Pattern
I laid down around 11, knocked out around midnight. Hit REM sleep, dreamed in the third person watching something going on. Got up at 6am.
Slightly more groggy than expected, but that might have been the hours.
Body And Positioning
I turned only twice: once to the right and once onto my back, which is where I stayed for a bit. lower left side hurt.
65 degrees seems to be the nighttime sweet spot. I was hot but not unbearably so.
Mattress Durability
Shape still intact. No noticeable softness, at least not like before the trip. Interesting.
Monday, March 09, 2015
Day 6: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge
Sleep Pattern
I felt a little groggy. Definitely less than the day prior. So my initial theory about my body getting "back used to" the mattress after travel is probably a sound theory.
Body And Positioning
Heat overcame, had to pull back the comforter again.
Mattress Durability
Sunday, March 08, 2015
Day 5: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge
Sleep Pattern
I laid down around 8pm, knocked out around 9pm, which is a record for me. I don't exactly remember reaching REM sleep though; I assume I must have and don't remember, but I was out until 7:00am the next morning. I got up groggy, which was strange.
To compare, the Spring Air mattress plus a waffle cone ice cream had me knocked out cold for a good 12 hours, but with no dreaming, even after reading rather vivid books. Without the waffle cone, I was about 6-7 hours sleep with mid-time wakeup.
Body And Positioning
No heat overcoming. This is with the thermostat set to 70 and the exterior temperature in the high 30's/low 40's; that's WITH pajama bottoms.
Mattress Durability
Monday, March 02, 2015
Day 4: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge
Sleep Pattern
Body And Positioning
No heat overcoming. This is with the thermostat set to 65 and the exterior temperature in the high 30's/low 40's. One difference here is that unlike usual, I didn't wear pajama bottoms. Interesting.
Mattress Durability
Sunday, March 01, 2015
Day 3: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge
Sleep Pattern
Again, it's a weekend and specifically a Sunday morning, so even fewer cars on the road. Tonight will be a good test of this theory, as it will be a Monday morning when I expect the worst of outside noise. If it turns out I get woken up midstream, it means that it's noise disrupting me, and once the new windows are in (which have sound control properties), it should be a somewhat better experience. The one window that I have in my home office which matches the forthcoming new ones performs so well that I get tempted to sleep in there every night.
Body And Positioning
Heat overcame me on a few occasions where I had to pull the comforter. In fact I fell asleep with just the sheet on because it was so hot. I was almost tempted to grab a fan. Mind, this is after the mattress sitting in a room not exceeding 65 degrees all day.
Mattress Durability
Saturday, February 28, 2015
Day 2: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge
Sleep Pattern
Body And Positioning
Mattress Durability
Friday, February 27, 2015
Day 1: The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge
Bodies take a while to adjust to a new mattress. It is this break-in period that makes people frustrated, because you can't account for it in a mattress store. It's the reason I'm going to share feedback over a number of days, because the experience will most certainly be different day-to-day as my body adjusts.
I noticed two things immediately with the Casper mattress. First, it kept its shape extremely well. Second, it never sunk in beyond a certain point even when just directly sitting on it. As a muscular 180-pound guy, this tells me that the mattress can definitely handle at least an "average" sized guy and lower.
My usual routine is to read and/or play mobile games until I get sleepy. I'll often start at around 8pm and be sleepy by 10pm-ish, sometimes longer. I didn't last that long with the Casper. I was definitely out before 10pm. My body was also its usual hotness, but despite being under a sheet and a comforter, it wasn't ever uncomfortable underneath me. The mattress started cool like a gel pad, then warmed just enough to match my body temperature. It never got softer.
I can only describe the experience as similar laying on a mattress pad at summer camp that has a topper on it (obviously, camp beds do not have toppers, I'm just saying). It's firm, but not uncomfortably firm. Although people who don't like firm mattresses may be up in arms at that statement, the mattress just did not cause any pain points with its level of firmness because it did give at the sharp points (hips, elbows, shoulders, etc) but stood fast at the dull points (side, abs, thighs, etc). You have the distinct feeling of lying on top of something flat, in other words, but whatever that something is, isn't pressing against your body like a table might.
I have a tendency to shift position over night mostly because of the old mattresses and I did so also with the Casper, but it was more out of habit than discomfort. I think my body was just expecting softness and didn't get it. That's okay, because unlike with the older mattresses, I did reach REM sleep on at least three occasions, and even though I woke up during the night (around 2:30am) like I usually do, it was not difficult to go back to sleep. I think I was woken up because of noise outside the window (my house is on an arterial, and the windows only cut noise down about 50%. That's changing in the near future), not the mattress.
This morning, I wasn't groggy when I got up. I wasn't as sharp as I might have been as a kid, but that could just be age. What's important is that I didn't have any lower back pain (which was common with the older mattresses), or neck pain, and I felt truly awake and rested. Had I not woken up in the middle of the night I might have felt even better, and hopefully that day will come. The mattress, of course, looks like I haven't even slept in it. Not a single dent, despite my shifting, sitting and turning over 12 hours.
It's safe to say that if you are a back sleeper this mattress will probably feel ultra comfortable. Side sleepers may have a longer adjustment period simply because your body has gotten used to "sinking in" where it won't with this mattress. Stomach sleepers (I still don't understand how this is even possible, but yeah) SHOULD be able to sleep soundly on this mattress with the right pillow. I think the problem with stomach sleepers is that your head and back get arched too much if you use a pillow that's too thick or too firm; you really should go without a pillow or get a down pillow so that your spine remains in alignment.
Tune in tomorrow for the next sleep experience.
The 30-Day @Casper Mattress Challenge: Order Process
Image screenshot credit: http://www.casper.com |
Sunday, October 19, 2014
Frontier Airlines. You're ALMOST There.
I had a recent opportunity to not only fly on Frontier Airlines for the very first time (including the precedent airlines, Midwest and Republic), but to sample their nonstop route between Seattle, WA and Cleveland, OH. The creation of nonstop routes used to be a "meh" moment, since every airline was traveling nonstop between popular destinations. But as larger airlines merged and bought each other out and/or filed bankruptcy, we see less and less nonstop flights. I want to share the experience, as well as tell you a bit about Frontier Airlines from an infrequent flyer's perspective.
Dear Mr. President: You're Wrong About #Ebola
Has anyone noticed how oddly similar the Ebola strain looks to Michaelangelo's "Creation of Adam"? Coincidence? I think not.
Anyway, that's not the point of this post, Mr. Obama. The point of the post is to call you out on a few things where you have publicly criticized "hysteria and fear". This is because you totally missed the boat on why people are afraid. They have legitimate concerns that haven't been addressed by the government that is elected to look out for them. Here's what you missed.
Saturday, July 05, 2014
Like A Boss: How To Debate Effectively
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Buying That First Home Round Two - Part 4
Get Your Funding In Order.
Saturday, March 01, 2014
Buying That First Home Round Two - Part 3
Banks Don't Really Like Short Sales.
Saturday, February 22, 2014
Buying That First Home Round Two - Part 2
Do Your Own Research BEFORE Contacting a REALTOR
Assuming you've gotten this far, it's important you understand what you're up against in terms of what's out there. Depending on your buying power, you may find lots of inventory or very little. It really does depend on the metro, and in this current economy, a lot of homes are being taken by Chinese investors who are dropping 100% cash to buy the homes as an investment (and in some cases, to hide their income in another country). What's left over is going to fit into a number of categories, and you should understand the differences.
Saturday, February 15, 2014
Buying That First Home Round Two - Part 1
Since coming to Washington State I've realized that, though I'm working harder than I ever have before, the opportunity and net cost of living are dramatically different. This year, as a New Years Resolution, I resolved to do two things: (A) graduate college and (B) buy a home. Both are in progress (I told you about Western Governors University), but let me talk about (B), and let's see if I can help you.
Tuesday, January 07, 2014
Gay Rights <> Civil (Race) Rights
Saturday, January 04, 2014
What is the "Parable Test"?
In a simple definition, the measurement of the Parable Test is that something must meet at least one of four criteria (though ideally it would meet all of them): Quantifiable, Justifiable, Verifiable, Testable. But what's that exactly mean?
Analyzing the Pacquiao/Marquez Feud
The boxing universe (if there is such a thing) waxes emotional about certain feuds. Ward/Gatti, Ali/Frazier, Ali/Liston, Tyson/Holyfield, Leonard/Duran, and a whole host of others across various weight classes. Many years from now, they will be hotly debating one of the most controversial feuds in history: Manny Pacquiao and Juan Manuel Marquez - two certified Hall of Famers. But if you look past the fights themselves and analyze the fighters behind the fights, you'll start to see some obvious signs about why they seemed so matched...and you can easily predict how each would perform against certain other notable fighters. First, let's look at the fights.